X — 8-tweet thread on an IRCC policy change

Structured 8-tweet thread explaining a specific IRCC manual / IRPR amendment / new processing rule.

CA · CanadaExtensionstandardID mkt-social-x-twitter-policy-thread

Write an X/Twitter thread of exactly 8 tweets explaining the IRCC policy change "[POLICY_TITLE]". Source: [SOURCE_URL] Effective: [EFFECTIVE_DATE] Who is affected: [WHO_AFFECTED] The change in 1 sentence: [KEY_CHANGE] Indian-applicant share: [INDIAN_SHARE] (omit tweet 6 if blank) Firm handle: [FIRM_HANDLE] Each tweet has a hard 270-char ceiling (leave room for thread-counter "1/8"). T1 (HOOK): The single most arresting fact. Number-led. Example: "IRCC just changed PGWP eligibility for 60,000+ students. Effective [EFFECTIVE_DATE]. Here's what an RCIC reads in the new manual — 8 tweets 👇 1/8" T2 (WHAT): the rule in plain English. No legalese. T3 (WHO): which applicant profiles this hits — name them specifically (e.g. "Indian students at Ontario private-college PPP partnerships, especially those starting in fall 2026"). T4 (BEFORE): how it used to work — 1 line. T5 (AFTER): how it works now — 1 line. Highlight the delta. T6 (INDIA ANGLE): [INDIAN_SHARE] in 1-2 sentences. Skip this tweet entirely (renumber rest) if [INDIAN_SHARE] is blank. T7 (ACTION): one concrete thing affected applicants should do this week. Specific. T8 (SIGNOFF + LINK): "Full IRCC source: [SOURCE_URL]. Run your case against this with us → DM open. — [FIRM_HANDLE]" CICC §44-46: • No guarantee/100%/success-rate language. • Do NOT claim insider IRCC contact. "We are an independent immigration consultancy" if origin needs to be stated. • No emojis in tweets 2-7 (signal: serious news). Emoji OK in T1 hook and T8 sign-off. Indian-English register fine. Banned: "passport to a new life", "Canadian dream", "your journey awaits". End with: "— DRAFT — for RCIC review. Verify every claim against [SOURCE_URL] before posting; do not invent IRPR section numbers."